Shalom,
!
Thursday, November 12, 2026
Thursday, November 12, 2026
Shalom,
!
Thursday, November 12, 2026
Thursday, November 12, 2026
Shalom,
!
Thursday, November 12, 2026
Thursday, November 12, 2026
Shalom,
!
Thursday, November 12, 2026
Thursday, November 12, 2026
Double check Wikipedia on Israel-related articles
A World Jewish Congress report alleges systematic anti-Israel bias in Arabic-language Wikipedia, saying the platform is being weaponized.
The Jewish World
3
mins read time
Originally published at
The Jewish World

Wikipedia logo on a mousepad in the grass. Photo courtesy of Moheen Reeyad via Wikimedia Commons.
The World Jewish Congress (WJC) released a report on Tuesday, March 24, highlighting “extensive and systemic bias” in the Arabic Wikipedia in various Israel-related articles.
Yfat Barak-Cheney, executive director of the Institute for Technology and Human Rights at WJC, stated that “one of the world’s most trusted knowledge platforms is being systematically manipulated to promote extremist narratives.”
Not neutral
“When terrorist propaganda and hate-driven narratives are allowed to masquerade as neutral information, the consequences extend far beyond Wikipedia itself,” she said. “These distortions shape public understanding and views of Jews and Israelis across the Arabic-speaking world.” (JNS sought comment from the Wikimedia Foundation.)
The report states that it examined nine articles in the Arabic Wikipedia and found that the online encyclopedia “consistently employs politically charged terminology that adopts the framing of militant groups while delegitimizing Israeli perspectives.” Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad are referred to as “resistance” in Arabic Wikipedia entries, and terrorists for each group are referred to as “martyrs,” while Israel is referred to as the “Zionist entity,” per the report.
Arabic Wikipedia entries also refer to the Hamas-led terrorist attacks on Oct. 7 as a “military operation” against “occupation forces” and the United Nations documenting rapes and sexual assault as being “Israeli propaganda,” per the report.
ADVERTISEMENT
Terror affiliated sources
The report also found a disproportionate use of terror-affiliated sources and state-run sources from governments that are antagonistic to the United States and its allies. It found more than 45,000 links to Qatari state media, more than 6,300 to Russian state media and more than 3,000 to Turkish state media. It also found around 2,500 links to Hezbollah-affiliated media outlets and more than 2,000 to websites affiliated with Hamas.
Administrators in the Arabic Wikipedia maintain the biased nature of the article, the report states, citing an example of an administrator banning an editor who attempted to put in evidence of Hamas’s sexual violence. It also states that the Arabic Wikipedia currently lacks an arbitration committee—the site’s binding dispute resolution panel of editors—as the English Wikipedia does, and instead has only a temporary committee that does not discuss its deliberations in a public forum.
Transparency?
The report lists a series of recommendations for the Wikimedia Foundation, including barring any glorification or whitewashing of terrorism. It also calls on lawmakers to investigate the foundation and require more transparency from Wikipedia.
“Wikipedia has long presented itself as humanity’s shared knowledge repository,” Barak-Cheney stated. “Ensuring that this knowledge remains factual is particularly critical as emerging AI platforms increasingly rely on multilingual information sources to formulate responses to user queries.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Double check Wikipedia on Israel-related articles
A World Jewish Congress report alleges systematic anti-Israel bias in Arabic-language Wikipedia, saying the platform is being weaponized.
The Jewish World
3
mins read time
Originally published at
The Jewish World

Wikipedia logo on a mousepad in the grass. Photo courtesy of Moheen Reeyad via Wikimedia Commons.
The World Jewish Congress (WJC) released a report on Tuesday, March 24, highlighting “extensive and systemic bias” in the Arabic Wikipedia in various Israel-related articles.
Yfat Barak-Cheney, executive director of the Institute for Technology and Human Rights at WJC, stated that “one of the world’s most trusted knowledge platforms is being systematically manipulated to promote extremist narratives.”
Not neutral
“When terrorist propaganda and hate-driven narratives are allowed to masquerade as neutral information, the consequences extend far beyond Wikipedia itself,” she said. “These distortions shape public understanding and views of Jews and Israelis across the Arabic-speaking world.” (JNS sought comment from the Wikimedia Foundation.)
The report states that it examined nine articles in the Arabic Wikipedia and found that the online encyclopedia “consistently employs politically charged terminology that adopts the framing of militant groups while delegitimizing Israeli perspectives.” Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad are referred to as “resistance” in Arabic Wikipedia entries, and terrorists for each group are referred to as “martyrs,” while Israel is referred to as the “Zionist entity,” per the report.
Arabic Wikipedia entries also refer to the Hamas-led terrorist attacks on Oct. 7 as a “military operation” against “occupation forces” and the United Nations documenting rapes and sexual assault as being “Israeli propaganda,” per the report.
ADVERTISEMENT
Terror affiliated sources
The report also found a disproportionate use of terror-affiliated sources and state-run sources from governments that are antagonistic to the United States and its allies. It found more than 45,000 links to Qatari state media, more than 6,300 to Russian state media and more than 3,000 to Turkish state media. It also found around 2,500 links to Hezbollah-affiliated media outlets and more than 2,000 to websites affiliated with Hamas.
Administrators in the Arabic Wikipedia maintain the biased nature of the article, the report states, citing an example of an administrator banning an editor who attempted to put in evidence of Hamas’s sexual violence. It also states that the Arabic Wikipedia currently lacks an arbitration committee—the site’s binding dispute resolution panel of editors—as the English Wikipedia does, and instead has only a temporary committee that does not discuss its deliberations in a public forum.
Transparency?
The report lists a series of recommendations for the Wikimedia Foundation, including barring any glorification or whitewashing of terrorism. It also calls on lawmakers to investigate the foundation and require more transparency from Wikipedia.
“Wikipedia has long presented itself as humanity’s shared knowledge repository,” Barak-Cheney stated. “Ensuring that this knowledge remains factual is particularly critical as emerging AI platforms increasingly rely on multilingual information sources to formulate responses to user queries.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Double check Wikipedia on Israel-related articles
A World Jewish Congress report alleges systematic anti-Israel bias in Arabic-language Wikipedia, saying the platform is being weaponized.
The Jewish World
3
mins read time
Originally published at
The Jewish World

Wikipedia logo on a mousepad in the grass. Photo courtesy of Moheen Reeyad via Wikimedia Commons.
The World Jewish Congress (WJC) released a report on Tuesday, March 24, highlighting “extensive and systemic bias” in the Arabic Wikipedia in various Israel-related articles.
Yfat Barak-Cheney, executive director of the Institute for Technology and Human Rights at WJC, stated that “one of the world’s most trusted knowledge platforms is being systematically manipulated to promote extremist narratives.”
Not neutral
“When terrorist propaganda and hate-driven narratives are allowed to masquerade as neutral information, the consequences extend far beyond Wikipedia itself,” she said. “These distortions shape public understanding and views of Jews and Israelis across the Arabic-speaking world.” (JNS sought comment from the Wikimedia Foundation.)
The report states that it examined nine articles in the Arabic Wikipedia and found that the online encyclopedia “consistently employs politically charged terminology that adopts the framing of militant groups while delegitimizing Israeli perspectives.” Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad are referred to as “resistance” in Arabic Wikipedia entries, and terrorists for each group are referred to as “martyrs,” while Israel is referred to as the “Zionist entity,” per the report.
Arabic Wikipedia entries also refer to the Hamas-led terrorist attacks on Oct. 7 as a “military operation” against “occupation forces” and the United Nations documenting rapes and sexual assault as being “Israeli propaganda,” per the report.
ADVERTISEMENT
Terror affiliated sources
The report also found a disproportionate use of terror-affiliated sources and state-run sources from governments that are antagonistic to the United States and its allies. It found more than 45,000 links to Qatari state media, more than 6,300 to Russian state media and more than 3,000 to Turkish state media. It also found around 2,500 links to Hezbollah-affiliated media outlets and more than 2,000 to websites affiliated with Hamas.
Administrators in the Arabic Wikipedia maintain the biased nature of the article, the report states, citing an example of an administrator banning an editor who attempted to put in evidence of Hamas’s sexual violence. It also states that the Arabic Wikipedia currently lacks an arbitration committee—the site’s binding dispute resolution panel of editors—as the English Wikipedia does, and instead has only a temporary committee that does not discuss its deliberations in a public forum.
Transparency?
The report lists a series of recommendations for the Wikimedia Foundation, including barring any glorification or whitewashing of terrorism. It also calls on lawmakers to investigate the foundation and require more transparency from Wikipedia.
“Wikipedia has long presented itself as humanity’s shared knowledge repository,” Barak-Cheney stated. “Ensuring that this knowledge remains factual is particularly critical as emerging AI platforms increasingly rely on multilingual information sources to formulate responses to user queries.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Double check Wikipedia on Israel-related articles
A World Jewish Congress report alleges systematic anti-Israel bias in Arabic-language Wikipedia, saying the platform is being weaponized.
The Jewish World
3
mins read time
Originally published at
The Jewish World

Wikipedia logo on a mousepad in the grass. Photo courtesy of Moheen Reeyad via Wikimedia Commons.
The World Jewish Congress (WJC) released a report on Tuesday, March 24, highlighting “extensive and systemic bias” in the Arabic Wikipedia in various Israel-related articles.
Yfat Barak-Cheney, executive director of the Institute for Technology and Human Rights at WJC, stated that “one of the world’s most trusted knowledge platforms is being systematically manipulated to promote extremist narratives.”
Not neutral
“When terrorist propaganda and hate-driven narratives are allowed to masquerade as neutral information, the consequences extend far beyond Wikipedia itself,” she said. “These distortions shape public understanding and views of Jews and Israelis across the Arabic-speaking world.” (JNS sought comment from the Wikimedia Foundation.)
The report states that it examined nine articles in the Arabic Wikipedia and found that the online encyclopedia “consistently employs politically charged terminology that adopts the framing of militant groups while delegitimizing Israeli perspectives.” Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad are referred to as “resistance” in Arabic Wikipedia entries, and terrorists for each group are referred to as “martyrs,” while Israel is referred to as the “Zionist entity,” per the report.
Arabic Wikipedia entries also refer to the Hamas-led terrorist attacks on Oct. 7 as a “military operation” against “occupation forces” and the United Nations documenting rapes and sexual assault as being “Israeli propaganda,” per the report.
ADVERTISEMENT
Terror affiliated sources
The report also found a disproportionate use of terror-affiliated sources and state-run sources from governments that are antagonistic to the United States and its allies. It found more than 45,000 links to Qatari state media, more than 6,300 to Russian state media and more than 3,000 to Turkish state media. It also found around 2,500 links to Hezbollah-affiliated media outlets and more than 2,000 to websites affiliated with Hamas.
Administrators in the Arabic Wikipedia maintain the biased nature of the article, the report states, citing an example of an administrator banning an editor who attempted to put in evidence of Hamas’s sexual violence. It also states that the Arabic Wikipedia currently lacks an arbitration committee—the site’s binding dispute resolution panel of editors—as the English Wikipedia does, and instead has only a temporary committee that does not discuss its deliberations in a public forum.
Transparency?
The report lists a series of recommendations for the Wikimedia Foundation, including barring any glorification or whitewashing of terrorism. It also calls on lawmakers to investigate the foundation and require more transparency from Wikipedia.
“Wikipedia has long presented itself as humanity’s shared knowledge repository,” Barak-Cheney stated. “Ensuring that this knowledge remains factual is particularly critical as emerging AI platforms increasingly rely on multilingual information sources to formulate responses to user queries.”
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Related News

World
Global
‘Horrifying’: Germany still not safe for Jews, chancellor says on Kristallnacht anniversary
Speaking at a Munich synagogue, Friedrich Merz said armed guards outside Jewish institutions show open Jewish life in Germany is still not possible.
Rikki Zagelbaum
November 12, 2026

World
Israel & Middle East
Herzog urges expanded peace agreements, unity at opening of 26th Knesset
Israel’s president used the new Knesset’s first session to press for broader regional ties, a full term for lawmakers and a reckoning with Oct. 7.
Joshua Marks
November 12, 2026

World
Israel & Middle East
Can Gadi Eisenkot assemble Israel’s next governing coalition?
Analysts weigh whether the Yashar leader can reach a Knesset majority without breaking his campaign promises.
Amelie Botbol
November 12, 2026

World
Global
‘Horrifying’: Germany still not safe for Jews, chancellor says on Kristallnacht anniversary
Speaking at a Munich synagogue, Friedrich Merz said armed guards outside Jewish institutions show open Jewish life in Germany is still not possible.
Rikki Zagelbaum
November 12, 2026

World
Israel & Middle East
Herzog urges expanded peace agreements, unity at opening of 26th Knesset
Israel’s president used the new Knesset’s first session to press for broader regional ties, a full term for lawmakers and a reckoning with Oct. 7.
Joshua Marks
November 12, 2026

World
Israel & Middle East
Can Gadi Eisenkot assemble Israel’s next governing coalition?
Analysts weigh whether the Yashar leader can reach a Knesset majority without breaking his campaign promises.
Amelie Botbol
November 12, 2026

World
Israel & Middle East
Boy George at Nova massacre site: ‘I couldn’t just sit and do nothing’
The British pop star toured the Nova festival massacre site in southern Israel, then was honored by President Herzog in Jerusalem.
Etgar Lefkovits
November 5, 2026
© 2026 The Jewish World · Since 1965 - The Capital Region's gateway to Jewish life
Designed and Developed by Ta-Da Studios
© 2026 The Jewish World · Since 1965 - The Capital Region's gateway to Jewish life
Designed and Developed by Ta-Da Studios
© 2026 The Jewish World · Since 1965 - The Capital Region's gateway to Jewish life
Designed and Developed by Ta-Da Studios
© 2026 The Jewish World · Since 1965 - The Capital Region's gateway to Jewish life
Designed and Developed by Ta-Da Studios
